<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ClickOnce, I think I love you</title>
	<atom:link href="http://averyblog.com/net/clickonce-i-think-i-love-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://averyblog.com/net/clickonce-i-think-i-love-you/</link>
	<description>This is not the greatest tagline in the world... this is just a tribute.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:36:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Marman</title>
		<link>http://averyblog.com/net/clickonce-i-think-i-love-you/comment-page-1/#comment-2083</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Marman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 01:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://averyblog.infozerk.net/?p=615#comment-2083</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There are many things I love about ClickOnce, but the one thing that really gets me is that the application manifest has to be signed with the deployment url or the app doesn&#039;t load. This means 1) no aliases and 2) you effectively can&#039;t package them (as most enterprises would do). We&#039;ve worked around this by using mage at install time, but even then you can&#039;t test a node directly... and if you rename the cluster, it fails.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It&#039;s a little disappointing that they&#039;ve implemented yet another level of security instead of relying on the underlying .NET trust (e.g., let me trust everything signed by a particular publisher). I&#039;m told this restriction will be lifted in the future somewhat - that is, the deployment url will be dynamically populated based on where it was first run from. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That reminds me, I&#039;ve been meaning to write up my experiences with ClickOnce.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many things I love about ClickOnce, but the one thing that really gets me is that the application manifest has to be signed with the deployment url or the app doesn&#8217;t load. This means 1) no aliases and 2) you effectively can&#8217;t package them (as most enterprises would do). We&#8217;ve worked around this by using mage at install time, but even then you can&#8217;t test a node directly&#8230; and if you rename the cluster, it fails.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a little disappointing that they&#8217;ve implemented yet another level of security instead of relying on the underlying .NET trust (e.g., let me trust everything signed by a particular publisher). I&#8217;m told this restriction will be lifted in the future somewhat &#8211; that is, the deployment url will be dynamically populated based on where it was first run from. </p>
<p>That reminds me, I&#8217;ve been meaning to write up my experiences with ClickOnce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

